|
Post by losergeek1138 on Jul 10, 2004 3:21:03 GMT -5
i can't even talk to a girl i'm attracted to without getting an erection. i suppose this is normal if you're 14, but i'm almost 27!
|
|
|
Post by spitzig on Jul 11, 2004 21:01:28 GMT -5
Why's it a problem? Just wear pants that don't show it, or maneuver yourself so it doesn't show.
|
|
|
Post by SadSadSoul on Jul 11, 2004 22:40:23 GMT -5
My problem is breast, even with females I don't find attractive. It's weird.
|
|
|
Post by losergeek1138 on Jul 12, 2004 1:08:12 GMT -5
well, i'm pretty sure it doesn't show cause of my fanny pack, but what scares me is the idea a girl might notice and think i'm a pervert...
|
|
max
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by max on Jul 12, 2004 11:13:30 GMT -5
Still happens to me on occassion, and I'm older than you!
|
|
|
Post by CaryGrant on Jul 12, 2004 11:16:37 GMT -5
I'd say wearing a fanny pack is sending a worse message than the erection. Clearly you find this woman highly attractive  so try and think non-erotic thoughts when talking to her.
|
|
|
Post by sushiboat on Jul 12, 2004 11:32:48 GMT -5
Masturbate more often, and get plenty of sleep. I find that when I haven't had enough rest, I get erections much more often.
|
|
|
Post by losergeek1138 on Jul 12, 2004 14:20:23 GMT -5
i already mb practically every day.  as for the fanny pack, i refuse to abandon something so clearly convenient and useful for something as ridiculous as fashion, and any woman worth being with would be willing to understand that.
|
|
l0ner
Junior Member

Posts: 68
|
Post by l0ner on Jul 12, 2004 14:41:57 GMT -5
i already mb practically every day.  as for the fanny pack, i refuse to abandon something so clearly convenient and useful for something as ridiculous as fashion, and any woman worth being with would be willing to understand that. Dude.....the fanny pack is a HUGE turn-off. It really is the most ridiculous looking thing a guy can wear....I don't even see women wearing them. Just get a backpack.
|
|
|
Post by losergeek1138 on Jul 12, 2004 18:32:17 GMT -5
see a backpack is usefull for carrying large things around. not so good for stuff like my wallet, my change, pen and paper, cellphone, sunglasses, etc.
why should i have to abandon it just because whatever assholes made up fashion declared that it was "dated" and "no longer fashionable". fuck them i say.
|
|
|
Post by Alecto on Jul 12, 2004 19:34:09 GMT -5
see a backpack is usefull for carrying large things around. not so good for stuff like my wallet, my change, pen and paper, cellphone, sunglasses, etc.. That stuff won't fit in your pockets? I'm not really a huge fan of the fanny pack thing either. That would be more noticable to me.
|
|
|
Post by losergeek1138 on Jul 12, 2004 19:48:57 GMT -5
nope, i carry around enough stuff that it's easier and more comfortable for me to use a fanny pack.
|
|
|
Post by Alecto on Jul 12, 2004 19:55:38 GMT -5
haha... Well okay then. At least its not a purse ;D
|
|
|
Post by losergeek1138 on Jul 12, 2004 20:07:03 GMT -5
nope, wouldn't carry a purse. or a "manpurse". for one thing, i'd have to carry two so i could keep the distribution of weight symmetrical.
|
|
|
Post by Alecto on Jul 12, 2004 20:22:15 GMT -5
nope, wouldn't carry a purse. or a "manpurse". for one thing, i'd have to carry two so i could keep the distribution of weight symmetrical.  "manpurse".... The whole thought of that just disturbs me.
|
|