|
|
How sad
Aug 12, 2008 16:14:12 GMT -5
Post by pnoopiepnats on Aug 12, 2008 16:14:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
How sad
Aug 12, 2008 19:44:52 GMT -5
Post by HybridMoment on Aug 12, 2008 19:44:52 GMT -5
Damn commies.
At least the girls didn't seem to mind too much though.
|
|
gaia
New Member
Posts: 9
|
How sad
Aug 12, 2008 21:03:48 GMT -5
Post by gaia on Aug 12, 2008 21:03:48 GMT -5
That is really sad. And pointless.
|
|
|
|
How sad
Aug 13, 2008 0:33:10 GMT -5
Post by Sweet Pea on Aug 13, 2008 0:33:10 GMT -5
you think the media is superficial now, high definition television is gonna amp that up bigtime.  |
|
gaia
New Member
Posts: 9
|
How sad
Aug 13, 2008 14:07:20 GMT -5
Post by gaia on Aug 13, 2008 14:07:20 GMT -5
you think the media is superficial now, high definition television is gonna amp that up bigtime. Good point! You know what i'm going to do? Throw my TV out the window!  |
|
|
|
How sad
Aug 13, 2008 14:32:00 GMT -5
Post by Naptaq on Aug 13, 2008 14:32:00 GMT -5
you think the media is superficial now, high definition television is gonna amp that up bigtime. Good point! You know what i'm going to do? Throw my TV out the window! If it's HD please reconsider and sell it instead |
|
|
|
How sad
Aug 13, 2008 18:51:12 GMT -5
Post by Sweet Pea on Aug 13, 2008 18:51:12 GMT -5
Good point! You know what i'm going to do? Throw my TV out the window! If it's HD please reconsider and sell it instead ugh...i don't think i want anything to do with it. i visited someone in a fancy half-million dollar condo yesterday, and he has one of those gigantic shiny black plasma tv's that's like 6 feet long by 4 feet high. i tried to watch the news for a bit, but i could see every tiny wrinkle and freckle on that thing! it was weird & distracting. if i had one of those i'd have to sit 20 feet away from it.  |
|
|
|
How sad
Aug 13, 2008 20:01:32 GMT -5
Post by MrNice on Aug 13, 2008 20:01:32 GMT -5
yeah, I read that they had problems shooting porn in HD because of that
|
|
|
|
How sad
Aug 13, 2008 23:20:04 GMT -5
Post by Sweet Pea on Aug 13, 2008 23:20:04 GMT -5
yeah, I read that they had problems shooting porn in HD because of that omg...perish the thought! you'd see every pimple on every butt in minute detail... |
|
gaia
New Member
Posts: 9
|
How sad
Aug 13, 2008 23:57:31 GMT -5
Post by gaia on Aug 13, 2008 23:57:31 GMT -5
yeah, I read that they had problems shooting porn in HD because of that omg...perish the thought! you'd see every pimple on every butt in minute detail... How fucking awful will that be? A WOMAN... with a FLAW!  |
|
|
|
How sad
Aug 13, 2008 23:59:35 GMT -5
Post by Sweet Pea on Aug 13, 2008 23:59:35 GMT -5
omg...perish the thought! you'd see every pimple on every butt in minute detail... How fucking awful will that be? A WOMAN... with a FLAW! i really don't think you understand...it really is quite hideous. it's like it takes everybody's 'flaws' and magnifies them 100 times. |
|
gaia
New Member
Posts: 9
|
How sad
Aug 14, 2008 0:19:10 GMT -5
Post by gaia on Aug 14, 2008 0:19:10 GMT -5
How fucking awful will that be? A WOMAN... with a FLAW! i really don't think you understand...it really is quite hideous. it's like it takes everybody's 'flaws' and magnifies them 100 times. Perhaps it's what we need. People need to see that, actually, nobody is perfect. I'm really sick of unrealistic images being shoved in my face... and i'm also really sick of those who actually believing these images are a true representation of people. *Steps off soapbox* |
|
|
|
How sad
Aug 14, 2008 5:45:25 GMT -5
Post by Naptaq on Aug 14, 2008 5:45:25 GMT -5
How fucking awful will that be? A WOMAN... with a FLAW! i really don't think you understand...it really is quite hideous. it's like it takes everybody's 'flaws' and magnifies them 100 times. Well after HD there's gonna be 3-D in even higher definition! And that's gonna amp up the so called flaws to the whole nother dimention. Wait, with the help of computers there isn't gonna be no flaws, in movies at least.  But we're still a long way away from home 3-D. As a side note, WALL-E was Pixar's last movie made for 2-D. Every year there's more movies that are 3-D first, 2-D second. |
|
|
|
How sad
Aug 14, 2008 6:49:05 GMT -5
Post by Sweet Pea on Aug 14, 2008 6:49:05 GMT -5
i really don't think you understand...it really is quite hideous. it's like it takes everybody's 'flaws' and magnifies them 100 times. Perhaps it's what we need. People need to see that, actually, nobody is perfect. I'm really sick of unrealistic images being shoved in my face... and i'm also really sick of those who actually believing these images are a true representation of people. *Steps off soapbox* i guess that's what i'm trying to explain (badly apparently). HD makes them look worse than they do in real life. i've seen the local news people in real life and they don't look THAT bad. one news anchor who looks perfectly normal irl looks like an ancient crone on HD. actually, i think that this will just make things worse. they'll probably only hire perfectly flawless people to work on tv now. |
|
|
|
How sad
Aug 14, 2008 6:51:53 GMT -5
Post by Sweet Pea on Aug 14, 2008 6:51:53 GMT -5
i really don't think you understand...it really is quite hideous. it's like it takes everybody's 'flaws' and magnifies them 100 times. Well after HD there's gonna be 3-D in even higher definition! And that's gonna amp up the so called flaws to the whole nother dimention. Wait, with the help of computers there isn't gonna be no flaws, in movies at least. But we're still a long way away from home 3-D. As a side note, WALL-E was Pixar's last movie made for 2-D. Every year there's more movies that are 3-D first, 2-D second. hmmm...maybe they'll end up making 'rose colored glasses' for those of us who prefer life to have that nice fuzzy, blurry look. i remember the first time i got corrective lenses i was very distressed by being able to see how dirty everything was, lol. ;D |
|
