|
|
Post by pnoopiepnats on Jun 30, 2007 14:03:30 GMT -5
Dubya Bush also went to Yale, didn't he?  Besides, HC became a senator years after BC was already in office, both as Govenor of Arkansas and President. one could make the case that she used his fame and influence to propel herself to the top. She also was elected Senator of New York without even really being of that state's citizenry. I'd think that a populace would rather elect someone of their own pool of citizens, someone with experience and knowledge of that state's problems and difficulties, not the new, popular kid on the block.  Also, just look at all the elected politicians in US history; many of them were lawyers too, and judges. I'd like to see a candidate without a legal background get into office, to be honest. I don't particularly trust lawyers to begin with, nor do i trust war heroes or high officers of the military seeking public office. Instead of electing thse, why don't we elect an already existing bureaucrat or public servant, someone with some real experience in the public role? I don't have any particular person in mind, just thinking out loud. Because being the President is all about managing people and money, not knowing law or hydraulic engineering. Ah well, i can speculate all i want, hehehe. We'll see what happens, and who gets nominated in 2008.  Because that's what's gonna matter. The persons nominated to the party ticket are the one's who will have the strong chance. I can see HC or Obama getting on the D party ticket, and i can see either Guilani or McCain on the R Party ticket. But we're still quite a ways from all that at the moment. And you completely ignored that everything GW has done was because of the wealth and influence of his father. Yes he went to Yale, but that is because his father went there. He was a poor student at best and would have never gotten in on his own merits. There is nothing in his record he has done for himself. |
|
|
|
Post by jwwimpy on Jun 30, 2007 21:53:31 GMT -5
Dubya Bush also went to Yale, didn't he? Besides, HC became a senator years after BC was already in office, both as Govenor of Arkansas and President. one could make the case that she used his fame and influence to propel herself to the top. She also was elected Senator of New York without even really being of that state's citizenry. I'd think that a populace would rather elect someone of their own pool of citizens, someone with experience and knowledge of that state's problems and difficulties, not the new, popular kid on the block. Also, just look at all the elected politicians in US history; many of them were lawyers too, and judges. I'd like to see a candidate without a legal background get into office, to be honest. I don't particularly trust lawyers to begin with, nor do i trust war heroes or high officers of the military seeking public office. Instead of electing thse, why don't we elect an already existing bureaucrat or public servant, someone with some real experience in the public role? I don't have any particular person in mind, just thinking out loud. Because being the President is all about managing people and money, not knowing law or hydraulic engineering. Ah well, i can speculate all i want, hehehe. We'll see what happens, and who gets nominated in 2008. Because that's what's gonna matter. The persons nominated to the party ticket are the one's who will have the strong chance. I can see HC or Obama getting on the D party ticket, and i can see either Guilani or McCain on the R Party ticket. But we're still quite a ways from all that at the moment. And you completely ignored that everything GW has done was because of the wealth and influence of his father. Yes he went to Yale, but that is because his father went there. He was a poor student at best and would have never gotten in on his own merits. There is nothing in his record he has done for himself. And you have completely ignored the fact that you have just described anyone in politics with the surnames "Kennedy", "Gore", "Dailey", etc. |
|
|
|
Post by phoenixferret on Jun 30, 2007 21:58:43 GMT -5
And you have completely ignored the fact that you have just described anyone in politics with the surnames "Kennedy", "Gore", "Dailey", etc. How did she? Russ favors Bush but denounces Hilary for having been allowed similar advantages. Russ is the one spouting off about family privelege; no one else said it was a problem. |
|
|
|
Post by shybuteager on Jul 27, 2007 3:08:05 GMT -5
Her facial and body language , mostly facial, make me think she lies like a rug. I wouldn't trust her to so much as put out my garbage. At least with her husband I'd know he's looking to get in my pants or get me on my knees.
She wouldn't get caught like Bill did, due to a head girl that doesn't swallow. I'd bet against her having a boy, that could drip his cum on the rug, under the desk. It would be a girl and the bookies in Vagas would probably be making book on it being a "Fem" chick or a "Butch" chick. I wouldn't be surprised if they were already working on setting up odds.
|
|
|
|
Post by phoenixferret on Jul 27, 2007 15:16:16 GMT -5
Her facial and body language , mostly facial, make me think she lies like a rug. I wouldn't trust her to so much as put out my garbage. At least with her husband I'd know he's looking to get in my pants or get me on my knees. She wouldn't get caught like Bill did, due to a head girl that doesn't swallow. I'd bet against her having a boy, that could drip his cum on the rug, under the desk. It would be a girl and the bookies in Vagas would probably be making book on it being a "Fem" chick or a "Butch" chick. I wouldn't be surprised if they were already working on setting up odds. Get your fish-and-piss-flavored cooter off my perfectly good thread, waa!  ...fish... piss... grapes... either Clinton... *shudder.* |
|
|
|
Post by Buzzz on Jul 27, 2007 15:23:48 GMT -5
Her facial and body language , mostly facial, make me think she lies like a rug. I wouldn't trust her to so much as put out my garbage. At least with her husband I'd know he's looking to get in my pants or get me on my knees. She wouldn't get caught like Bill did, due to a head girl that doesn't swallow. I'd bet against her having a boy, that could drip his cum on the rug, under the desk. It would be a girl and the bookies in Vagas would probably be making book on it being a "Fem" chick or a "Butch" chick. I wouldn't be surprised if they were already working on setting up odds. I've read that post about five times and I still have no idea what it says. Well, other than that you have an irrational hatred of the Clintons. |
|
|
|
Post by shybuteager on Jul 30, 2007 4:40:55 GMT -5
OK, sweetie, I'll get my female flavored cooter off of your perfect thread. Being that you're so sensitive...
And, Buzzz might be right. Though, it's not completely irrational.
|
|
|
|
Post by Buzzz on Aug 6, 2007 13:16:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Sweet Pea on Aug 6, 2007 22:39:34 GMT -5
that little item oughta make alotta hearts go pitter pat. |
|
swwg
New Member
Posts: 27
|
Post by swwg on Sept 21, 2007 3:34:49 GMT -5
she is the most famous person that people don't really know... not even her closest friends know her well enough, she keeps herself from being known well... i can't wait till someone starts asking her the real tough questions.
|
|
|
|
Post by phoenixferret on Sept 21, 2007 4:07:29 GMT -5
i can't wait till someone starts asking her the real tough questions. Such as? |
|
|
|
Post by Richard Cunningham on Sept 21, 2007 6:37:42 GMT -5
i can't wait till someone starts asking her the real tough questions. Such as? What is the meaning of life? How many times will 9.35 go into 780,125,777 869.2? Does my butt look big in this? |
|
|
|
Post by lennythegiant on Oct 7, 2007 12:25:22 GMT -5
I guess I'm pretty much neutral, although I do tend to side with the conservative side usually.
|
|
Because that's what's gonna matter. The persons nominated to the party ticket are the one's who will have the strong chance.
